US Deferral Sparks Uncertainty: CVD Investigation Into Indian Solar Inputs Extended Until September 2026

US Deferral Sparks Uncertainty: CVD Investigation Into Indian Solar Inputs Extended Until September 2026

US Deferral Sparks Uncertainty: CVD Investigation Into Indian Solar Inputs Extended Until September 2026​

The US Department of Commerce has significantly deferred its final determination in the Countervailing Duty (CVD) investigation concerning solar panel inputs originating from India. The extension comes after Adani Enterprises firms, Mundra Solar Energy and Mundra Solar PV Ltd, requested additional time to meet the complex compliance requirements set by U.S. trade authorities.

The original deadline for this crucial decision was expected in the first week of July 2026. However, following filings reviewed by Moneycontrol, the Department has pushed back the final ruling until September 10, 2026. Provisional measures related to these inputs have also been extended from four months to six months.

Timeline and Scope of the Investigation​

The investigation pertains specifically to crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells and modules imported into the US from India. The process was initiated in July 2025 after petitioners, including First Solar and Hanwha Qcells, alleged that subsidized imports were negatively affecting domestic solar manufacturing.

In August 2025, the US International Trade Commission determined that these imports, alongside those from Laos and Indonesia, were causing injury to American manufacturers, thus initiating anti-dumping and CVD investigations. Mandated respondents in this process included Mundra Solar Energy and Mundra Solar PV Ltd.

Preliminary Findings and Imposement of CVD​

In its initial preliminary findings, published on February 20, 2026, the Department of Commerce imposed a significant penalty rate against the Indian entities. A preliminary countervailing duty (CVD) was set at 125.87% for Mundra Solar Energy and Mundra Solar PV.

The same 125.87% rate was also applied as the subsidy rate for all other Indian manufacturers of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules covered by the investigation. The Commerce Department justified this finding, in part, citing non-cooperation from the two entities during the review process.

Subsidies Alleged to Violate WTO Rules​

The U.S. Commerce Department concluded that there was a reasonable basis to believe that certain subsidies received by Indian manufacturers were inconsistent with the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM). These alleged schemes included India's Advance Authorization Programme (AAP) and the Duty-Free Import Authorization (DFIA) scheme.

The current deferral means that the provisional duties imposed by the US Commerce Department will remain in force until September 2026, despite the requested extension by the companies. This situation continues to prolong uncertainty for all Indian solar exporters covered under this extensive investigation.
 

Disclaimer: Due care and diligence have been taken in compiling and presenting news and market-related content. However, errors or omissions may arise despite such efforts.

The information provided is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Readers are advised to rely on their own assessment and judgment and consult appropriate financial advisers, if required, before taking any investment-related decisions.

Any views, opinions, or statements expressed, where applicable, are those of the respective analysts or experts and do not reflect the views of this website. The website has no association with such viewpoints and does not assume any responsibility for them.

Back
Top