IVP Limited Receives Order from Mumbai Port Trust Regarding Property Dispute

IVP Limited Receives Order from Mumbai Port Trust Regarding Property Dispute

IVP Limited Receives Order from Mumbai Port Trust Regarding Property Dispute​

IVP Limited has received an order passed by the Office of the Estate Officer, Mumbai Port Trust (MBPT), concerning a property dispute over its lease premises in Mumbai. The outcome details significant financial liabilities and ongoing legal challenges for the company, which is contesting the demands raised by MBPT.

The conflict pertains to the company's lease agreement with Mumbai Port Trust. MBPT has been raising bills since September 2006 that contradict a Supreme Court order dated January 13, 2004. IVP Limited has disputed these revised rent demands and asserts that it is making payments strictly in accordance with the aforementioned Supreme Court order.

IVP had previously filed a Writ Petition (No. 1439 of 2011) before the Bombay High Court against these demands, which is still pending disposal. Furthermore, in 2019, MBPT initiated eviction proceedings and filed claims for damages against IVP Limited. The Office of the Estate Officer, Mumbai Port Authority (MBPT), subsequently issued an order based on the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The details regarding the litigation outcome are as follows:

AspectDetails
Opposing AgencyMumbai Port Trust (MBPT)
Litigation BodyOffice of the Estate Officer, MBPT
Dispute SummaryDisputing revised rent demands raised by MBPT against a property on lease in Mumbai.

The order imposed by MBPT directed payment of two components: compensation and damages. The mandated compensation amounted to 56,84,13,376.16 (Rupees Fifty Six Crore Eighty Four Lakh Thirteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Six and Sixteen Paise Only), including Service Tax, GST, and Interest. Damages were ordered at 79,97,39,419.79 (Rupees Seventy Nine Crore Ninety Seven Lakh Thirty Nine Thousand Four Hundred Nineteen and Seventy Nine Paise Only), which also includes GST and Interest.

In addition to this order, the company has pursued legal action concerning its demands. IVP’s Writ Petition No. 3530 of 2022, challenging the basis of these demands, has been filed and heard by a Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Mumbai, with the judgment reserved.

The financial implications resulting from the compensation and penalty are detailed in the company's position statement:

Financial ComponentAmount (Rupees)Nature
Compensation Arrears56,84,13,376.16Contingent Liability
Damages Imposed by MBPT79,97,39,419.79Contingent Liability
Total Contingent Liability92,59,18,726Claims against the company and other liabilities imposed by MBPT

The total quantum of claims levied against IVP Limited is 1,36,81,52,795.95 (Rupees One Hundred Thirty Six Crore Eighty One Lakh Fifty Two Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Five and Ninety Five Paise Only).

Looking ahead, the company intends to challenge the orders passed by MBPT through filing a Statutory Appeal or Writ Petition before the Hon'ble City Civil Court and the Hon'ble High Court of Mumbai.

IVP Stock Price Movement​

Shares of IVP Limited settled lower today, shedding 3.12% in trading to close at ₹161.95. The stock traded within a range during the session, finding its lowest point at ₹161.1 and reaching a high of ₹167.02.
 

Disclaimer: Due care and diligence have been taken in compiling and presenting news and market-related content. However, errors or omissions may arise despite such efforts.

The information provided is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Readers are advised to rely on their own assessment and judgment and consult appropriate financial advisers, if required, before taking any investment-related decisions.

Any views, opinions, or statements expressed, where applicable, are those of the respective analysts or experts and do not reflect the views of this website. The website has no association with such viewpoints and does not assume any responsibility for them.

Back
Top